You grab a Bible, flip past Genesis, Exodus, all those Old Testament books... but then you hit a blank page. Or maybe a fancy title card. Where does the New Testament start, exactly? Is it Matthew chapter 1? Does that introduction before Matthew count? Honestly, it tripped me up years ago when I first tried reading cover-to-cover. I remember sitting in a library with three different translations spread out, utterly confused about why one had maps and timelines before Matthew while another dove straight into "The book of the generation..."
Let’s cut through the confusion. If you're holding most standard Christian Bibles today, the literal answer is: the New Testament begins with the Gospel of Matthew. But – and here’s where it gets messy – the actual starting point isn't always page one of Matthew. Many modern Bibles pack in introductions, maps, or historical essays before the biblical text. My 2011 study Bible? 23 pages of background material before you hit Matthew 1:1. That’s like having a movie trailer play after you hit "play" on the main feature!
Quick Reality Check
Don't feel bad if you've wondered where the New Testament starts – it’s a common hiccup. The table below shows how different Bible formats obscure the true beginning:
| Bible Type | Physical Starting Point | Actual NT Content Start | Problem? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Paperback | Publisher's Preface | Matthew 1:1 | Minor intro text |
| Study Bible (e.g., NIV Study Bible) | Title Page | After 10-30 pages of notes | Major detour |
| Digital App (YouVersion) | Home Screen | Matthew 1:1 only after navigation | Interface hurdle |
| Audio Bible | "Genesis Chapter 1..." | After 60+ hours of OT | No visual markers |
See what trips people up? That gap between the physical start and the theological start. Frustrating when you just want to dive in.
Breaking Down the Concrete Starting Lines
Okay, let's ignore publisher fluff. The raw New Testament text always kicks off with one of these four openings:
- Matthew: "The book of the generation of Jesus Christ..." (KJV) – Straight into a genealogy
- Mark: "The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ..." – Immediate action
- Luke: "Forasmuch as many have taken in hand..." – A formal historian's preface
- John: "In the beginning was the Word..." – Philosophical/theological prologue
Why does Matthew usually come first? Blame history, not theology. Early church leaders like Eusebius arranged the Gospels in perceived chronological order, thinking Matthew was written first (though most scholars now believe Mark was earliest). Tradition stuck. Personally, I think starting with John’s cosmic poetry would be more dramatic, but hey, tradition wins.
Bible Nerdy Detail: The oldest surviving complete New Testament manuscript (Codex Sinaiticus, 4th century) starts with Matthew. So historically, physically, and traditionally, Matthew 1:1 is ground zero. But is that the real beginning? Cue the controversy...
Beyond Page One: The Theological Launchpad
Here's where things get spicy. If you ask a theologian where the New Testament truly starts, you might get surprising answers:
"Matthew 1:1 is a literary start, but the New Covenant begins with Jesus' incarnation. The Gospels just report it."
– Dr. Lydia Chen, Biblical Studies Professor (from my 2020 seminary lecture notes)
She’s got a point. The New Testament’s foundation isn’t a verse – it’s an event. Here’s how perspectives shift:
| Viewpoint | True "Start" of the NT | Key Supporting Verse | Practical Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Literalist | Matthew 1:1 | "The book of the generation..." | Start reading at page one |
| Theological | Jesus' Birth (Incarnation) | Luke 2:11 "Unto you is born..." | Focus on the Christmas story |
| Prophetic | John the Baptist's Ministry | Mark 1:2-3 "As it is written..." | Begins with repentance theme |
| Covenantal | Jesus' Death & Resurrection | Hebrews 9:15-17 "He is the mediator..." | NT enacted through sacrifice |
This isn't just academic hair-splitting. It affects how we engage with the text. I once led a Bible study where we debated for 45 minutes whether the NT begins with prophecy fulfillment (Matthew) or raw action (Mark). Half the group wanted structure, half wanted immediacy. Both valid!
Reader Roadblocks and How to Dodge Them
Based on my conversations with confused readers, here’s what typically trips people up when finding where the New Testament starts:
- The "Study Notes" Trap: Modern study Bibles bury Matthew 1:1 under layers of commentary. Solution: Flip until you see chapter numbers.
- App Confusion: Digital platforms require tapping "New Testament" > "Matthew" > "Chapter 1." Not intuitive for tech-newbies.
- Audio Skipping: No visual cues. Listeners fatigue during Old Testament and miss the transition.
- Apocrypha Interference: Catholic Bibles include books like Maccabees between OT and NT, adding 100+ pages.
A parishioner told me last month: "I downloaded the Bible app, pressed play, and got 72 hours of Old Testament! Where does the New Testament start? I gave up." Heartbreaking, but avoidable. Pro tip: Bookmark Malachi 4 (last OT book) and Matthew 1 in physical Bibles.
Physical Bible Navigation Hack
Most Bibles have a 2-5 page gap between Malachi (OT end) and Matthew. Find it once, stick a colored tab there. Suddenly, locating where the New Testament starts becomes instant.
FAQs: Real Questions from Real People
Does the New Testament start at Matthew or Mark?
Always Matthew in traditional Bibles. But early manuscripts occasionally placed Mark first! The controversial "Marcan Priority" theory suggests Mark was written earliest, though still placed second in canon.
Why don't all Bibles start the NT at the same place?
Two reasons: 1) Extra materials (maps, timelines) push Matthew later, 2) Eastern Orthodox Buchs sometimes sequence books differently. Always check the Table of Contents.
Can the New Testament start with Jesus' crucifixion?
Theologically, yes. Paul argues the "old covenant" ended at Calvary (Galatians 3:23-25). But physically, the crucifixion narratives appear in all four Gospels, midway through.
Where does the New Testament start in Catholic Bibles?
Same as Protestant: Matthew 1. But Catholic editions include 7 deuterocanonical books before Matthew, making the gap larger. Navigate via contents page.
Is there an actual blank page between testaments?
Usually! Most Bishops’ committees mandate a blank page labeled "New Testament" or a divider. If yours doesn’t, write to the publisher – that’s poor design.
Why Getting This Right Matters
Seems trivial, right? Just flip pages. But I’ve seen people quit Bible reading over this. My nephew tried reading Scripture last year. He texted me: "Uncle, where does the New Testament start? I’m in Isaiah and drowning." Sent him a photo of Matthew 1:1. He’s now reading Romans. Moral? Clear entry points matter.
Here’s what changes when you nail the starting point:
- Readability: Jumping straight to Jesus’ ministry hooks modern readers better than Levitical laws.
- Theological Clarity: Seeing the NT as a fresh covenant (Jeremiah 31:31) reshapes understanding.
- Historical Context: Recognizing the 400-year gap between Malachi and Matthew explains cultural shifts.
Personal Take: I dislike how some study Bibles bury Matthew. Last month’s "Reader’s Edition" hid chapter 1 behind 18 pages of essays! Let the text speak first. Commentary should follow, not obstruct.
Actionable Next Steps
Don’t just find where the New Testament starts – engage it well:
- Physical Bible: Place a ribbon or tab at Matthew 1
- Digital: Bookmark Matthew 1:1 in your app
- Audio: Create a playlist starting at Matthew
- For groups: Distribute Bibles opened to Matthew 1
Beyond the First Page: Where the Story Actually Begins
Ultimately, obsessing over Matthew 1:1 misses the forest for the trees. The New Testament’s power isn’t in its opening line – it’s in the seismic shift it announces:
| Old Testament Reality | New Testament Revolution | Key Transition Verse |
|---|---|---|
| Law-based righteousness | Grace-based salvation | John 1:17 "Grace and truth came through Jesus Christ" |
| Animal sacrifices | Christ's once-for-all sacrifice | Hebrews 10:10 "We have been sanctified... once for all" |
| Prophetic anticipation | Fulfillment in Messiah | Matthew 5:17 "I have not come to abolish but to fulfill" |
So yes, technically, the New Testament starts at Matthew 1:1. But spiritually? It starts wherever you encounter Jesus in the text. Maybe that’s the genealogy (shocking inclusion of outsiders like Rahab). Maybe it’s John the Baptist’s fiery sermons. Or maybe it’s the resurrection.
My first real "start"? Age 17, reading Jesus’ words in Matthew 11:28: "Come to me, all you who are weary..." Page numbers didn’t matter. The living Word did. Find your Matthew 1. Then keep turning pages.
Comment