Let's be honest - we've all stood in front of some modern art installation scratching our heads. Maybe it was a blank canvas or a banana duct-taped to a wall. And that nagging question pops up: "But is this really art?" I remember vividly when I took my niece to a contemporary gallery last fall. She pointed at what looked like a pile of garbage and whispered, "Did someone forget to take out the trash?" Can't blame her. That experience got me thinking hard about the definition of the art.
Why Bother Defining Art Anyway?
You might wonder why we should care about pinning down the definition of the art. Well, it matters more than you'd think. When I started collecting local sculptures, I realized how confusing the art market can be without clear benchmarks. Galleries price similar-looking pieces wildly differently. Is that $10,000 splatter painting worthwhile? Understanding art's definition helps navigate:
- Investment decisions (that "emerging artist" might be genius or gimmick)
- Educational choices (should your kid pursue art school?)
- Legal disputes (copyright battles often hinge on artistic merit)
- Personal enjoyment (why some pieces resonate while others frustrate)
My neighbor, a retired teacher, once bought what turned out to be factory-produced decor thinking it was original art. Cost him $3,000. Ouch. That's why getting clear on the definition of art matters in practical terms.
How Experts Actually Define Art Today
Forget dictionary definitions. After interviewing curators and artists, I've found they use working frameworks rather than rigid rules. Most combine these criteria:
| Criterion | What It Means | Real-World Example |
|---|---|---|
| Intentional creation | Made deliberately as artistic expression | Jackson Pollock's drip paintings vs accidental paint spills |
| Conceptual depth | Communicates ideas beyond surface appearance | Banksy's shredded painting protest vs simple graffiti |
| Technical skill | Demonstrates craft mastery (controversial!) | Michelangelo's David vs readymade urinal |
| Cultural context | Responds to artistic traditions/conversations | Kehinde Wiley's portrait style commenting on classical art |
| Audience response | Provokes emotional/intellectual reaction | Picasso's Guernica vs decorative hotel art |
Notice how skill alone doesn't define it anymore? Contemporary art really muddied those waters. I used to dismiss abstract pieces until I saw a Rothko in person. Photos don't capture how those color fields vibrate - they physically affected me. Changed my perspective on skill versus experience.
Important nuance: The definition of the art evolves with culture. Medieval religious icons weren't considered "art" during their creation - they were worship tools. Only later did we redefine them as masterpieces.
Historical Shifts in Art's Definition
People get heated defending their preferred definition of art. But looking back shows how dramatically standards change:
Pre-Renaissance Era: Art as Craft
Before the 15th century, artists were seen as skilled tradespeople - glorified carpenters or decorators. No museums existed. Art served religious or utilitarian purposes exclusively. I once saw a Byzantine icon that was literally walked through villages to ward off plagues. Try calling that "decoration"!
The Renaissance Game-Changer
Everything shifted when artists like Da Vinci and Michelangelo started signing works and exploring secular themes. Art became about:
- Humanist ideals (celebrating human potential)
- Technical virtuosity (anatomy, perspective)
- Individual genius (the "artist" as celebrity)
This still influences popular art definitions today. Most tourists flock to the Louvre for Mona Lisa's technical mastery, not conceptual depth.
Modernism's Rebellion
Then came the rule-breakers. When Marcel Duchamp displayed a urinal as art in 1917, he shattered traditional definitions. Modern art focused on:
- Concept over craft (ideas trump skill)
- Experimental forms (cubism, surrealism)
- Challenging institutions (who decides what's art?)
Honestly? Some modern pieces still feel like pranks to me. I once saw an artwork that was just a clean gallery space titled "The Air Conditioning". Still not sure if genius or nonsense.
Contemporary Confusion
Today's art world embraces radical inclusivity. Key developments include:
| Trend | Impact on Art Definition | Controversy Level |
|---|---|---|
| Digital/VR art | Dematerializes physical creation | Medium |
| Participatory art | Viewers complete the artwork | High |
| Street art acceptance | Blurs legal/illegal boundaries | Medium |
| NFTs | Challenges uniqueness and ownership | Very High |
A friend recently paid thousands for an NFT image of a cartoon ape. Is it art or speculative asset? Both? Neither? The definition of the art stretches thinner than ever.
Case Study: Maurizio Cattelan's "Comedian" - the duct-taped banana sold for $150,000. Supporters called it brilliant institutional critique. Detractors called it proof art definitions are broken. Personally? I think it cleverly exposed how context creates value. But I wouldn't hang it in my kitchen.
Major Theories That Shape Art Definitions
Philosophers and critics have battled over art's definition for centuries. Here's how key theories play out in galleries today:
Formalism: Beauty in Form
Formalists like Clive Bell argue real art creates "significant form" - lines, colors, and shapes that move us regardless of subject matter. Think Matisse's cut-outs. Pure visual pleasure. I used to dismiss this approach as superficial until I got lost in a Kandinsky exhibition. Those colors sang.
Emotionalism: Art as Feeling
Leo Tolstoy claimed art transmits emotions from creator to audience. By this definition, a clumsy sketch conveying authentic grief beats a technically perfect but soulless portrait. I felt this visiting the Vietnam Veterans Memorial - those names carved in stone hit harder than any heroic statue.
Institutional Theory: The Art World Decides
This controversial stance says art is whatever museums, galleries and collectors validate. When a prestigious gallery displays it, it becomes art. Period. This explains why identical soup cans are grocery items until Warhol paints them. Honestly, this theory irritates me. It feels like cultural gatekeeping.
Functionalist Views: What Does Art Do?
Some argue art's definition depends on its societal role. Does it:
- Challenge power structures? (political art)
- Preserve cultural memory? (indigenous crafts)
- Provide aesthetic experience? (decorative arts)
At Santa Fe's Indian Market, I watched artisans create pottery using ancient techniques. Functional? Yes. Art? Unquestionably.
Testing Boundaries: When Does Something Become Art?
Let's get practical. How do you distinguish art from ordinary objects? Consider these real examples:
| Object | Art Context | Non-Art Context | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urinal | Duchamp's "Fountain" in museum | Plumbing supply store | Art (historical significance) |
| Child's drawing | Museum of Children's Art exhibition | Refrigerator door display | Art (intentional curation) |
| Sunset photo | Gallery print with artist statement | Tourist's Instagram post | Gray area (depends on intent) |
| AI-generated image | Museum's digital art biennale | Stock photo website | Emerging debate |
See how context transforms meaning? That's why many argue the definition of the art depends on framing. I've curated community shows where we exhibited factory workers' lunchboxes as cultural artifacts. Same objects, different perception.
"Calling something 'art' is really about intent and reception. If it's created or presented with artistic purpose and engaged with as art, that's what matters." - Elena Rodriguez, Museum Curator (from my interview notes)
Why Art's Definition Impacts You Personally
This isn't just academic. How we define art shapes:
- Art education: Schools cutting "non-essential" programs often misunderstand art's cognitive benefits
- Cultural funding: Governments fund what fits bureaucratic definitions
- Legal judgments: Copyright and censorship cases hinge on artistic merit definitions
- Personal creativity: Ever thought "I'm not a real artist"? Blame narrow definitions
My sister stopped painting because a teacher said her style lacked "technical rigor." Years later, she sold her "unskilled" folk art for $800 per piece. Definitions can empower or destroy.
Practical Guide: Applying Art Definitions in Daily Life
How do these definitions help ordinary art encounters? Try this framework next gallery visit:
- Check intentions: Read the wall text. What ideas is the artist exploring?
- Notice context: Why is this in a gallery rather than elsewhere?
- Assess impact: Does it make you feel or think differently? Even if uncomfortable?
- Consider craft: What skills (traditional or digital) were involved?
- Research reception: How have critics and audiences responded?
I used this approach at a controversial Tracey Emin exhibit. Her messy bed installation seemed lazy initially. But learning it explored depression and femininity transformed my understanding. Still not my taste, but I got it.
When Definitions Fail: Trust Your Judgment
Sometimes, you just dislike something labeled "important art." That's okay! Art definitions provide lenses, not prisons. I despise Jeff Koons' balloon animals despite their acclaim. Overpriced kitsch to me.
Your Burning Questions About Art Definitions Answered
Can anything be considered art?
Theoretically yes - but not everything is equally successful art. An unmade bed becomes art when displayed as commentary on mental health (Emin). Your unmade bed? Probably not. Context and intent create the distinction in the definition of the art.
Who ultimately decides what art is?
It's a negotiation between artists, institutions (museums/galleries), critics, collectors, and the public. Power imbalances exist though. Galleries historically excluded marginalized voices from the "official" art definition.
Does AI-generated imagery qualify as art?
Massive debate here. Some argue it lacks human intentionality. Others say the prompter or programmer creates artistic intent. I've seen stunning AI pieces in digital art fairs. But they rarely move me like human-made works. Something's missing.
Why do art definitions keep changing?
Art reflects its culture. As societies evolve, so do creative expressions and purposes. Photography wasn't initially considered "real art." Now it dominates museums. The definition of art expands to include new media and perspectives.
How important is technical skill in defining art?
Less crucial than before but still relevant. Extraordinary craft (like Japanese woodblock prints) remains impressive. But conceptual depth often matters more in contemporary definitions of the art. Bad technique with brilliant ideas beats pretty emptiness.
Developing Your Personal Art Definition
After years visiting galleries from Bilbao to Brooklyn, here's my working definition: Art is any human creation or selection that communicates meaning beyond utility through sensory experience, requiring active engagement from its audience.
Key takeaways for your own definition:
- It must involve human agency (directly or indirectly)
- It should communicate something (emotion, idea, critique)
- Form matters as much as concept (how it's made/displayed)
- The viewer completes the experience (interpretation is key)
But definitions shouldn't be rigid. Stay open. That graffiti-covered dumpster might just be trash... or an unintentional masterpiece. Keep looking.
What's your definition? Next time you see something questionable, ask not "Is this art?" but "What could this mean?" That shift changes everything. At least it did for me when I finally understood why that banana was taped to the wall.
Comment