Getting Past the Buzzword: What a Person Centered Approach Actually Is (And Isn't)
Honestly, the phrase gets tossed around so much it risks losing all meaning. It’s not just being nice or polite. It’s not about ticking boxes on a form. And it’s definitely not a one-size-fits-all program. A real person centered approach is a fundamental shift in how you think and act. It’s about starting from the individual person – their unique goals, history, preferences, strengths, and fears – and building support *with* them, not *for* or *at* them. It means the person is the driver, not just a passenger on your professional journey.The Core Principles You Can't Skip
Getting this right hinges on a few non-negotiable ideas:- Choice and Control: Real choices, not just picking between Option A or Option B *you* pre-selected. Control over their own life, schedule, body, and decisions.
- Respect and Dignity: Treating someone like a whole human being with inherent worth, regardless of their abilities, background, or situation. Sounds obvious? You'd be surprised.
- Partnership: Working *with* the person and their chosen supporters (family, friends, community) as equal partners. Ditching the "expert knows best" attitude.
- Strengths Focus: Identifying what the person *can* do, what they're good at, what motivates them – not just fixing deficits or problems.
- Flexibility: Being ready to adapt and change course based on what the person wants and needs *now*, not sticking rigidly to a plan made months ago.
I remember working with a client years ago who loved gardening but had mobility issues. The 'standard' approach suggested adaptive tools only. A true person centered approach meant asking *him* what he missed most. Turns out, it wasn't just the physical act, but the smell of the soil and chatting with neighbours over the fence. We shifted focus to accessible raised beds near his patio where he could still connect. Small shift, huge difference for him. Standard solutions often miss the point.
Person Centered vs. Traditional Models: Spotting the Difference
It’s easier to understand when you see them side-by-side:| Aspect | Traditional Approach | Person Centered Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | The diagnosis, the system, the service | The individual person and their life |
| Goal Setting | Professionals define goals (often measurable, clinical) | Person defines goals (can be life-oriented, like "feel less lonely," "cook for family") |
| Plan Creation | Professionals write the plan, often using standard templates | Person leads the planning *with* support; format is flexible |
| Decision Making | Professionals hold primary decision-making power | Person holds decision-making power; professionals advise and support |
| Role of Family/Supporters | Often secondary, informed after decisions | Key partners, included based on the person's wishes |
| Success Metrics | Compliance, completion of tasks, clinical outcomes | Person's satisfaction, progress toward *their* goals, quality of life indicators |
Why Bother? The Real-World Impact (Good and Less Good)
Let's cut to the chase. Is all this effort worth it? Does a person centered approach actually deliver? The evidence is pretty compelling:- Better Outcomes: People tend to be more motivated and engaged when working towards goals *they* care about. This often leads to better health results, more independence, and achieving personal milestones faster. Studies consistently show higher satisfaction.
- More Efficient Resource Use (Sometimes): Tailored support avoids wasting resources on services the person doesn't want or need. Focused on real priorities.
- Stronger Relationships: Builds trust and genuine connection between the person and professionals/supporters.
- Resilience: Empowering people builds their confidence to manage challenges.
But let's be real, it's not all sunshine:
The person centered approach demands a leap of faith and genuine commitment. It's harder in the short term, often more effective long-term.
- It Takes More Time Upfront: Seriously. Meaningful conversations, building trust, understanding complex lives – it can't be rushed. Budgets and schedules often fight against this.
- Messy and Unpredictable: Real lives aren't linear. Goals change. Circumstances shift. Rigid systems struggle with this fluidity.
- Staff Training & Culture Shift: It requires a massive shift in how staff think and act. Old habits die hard. Not everyone finds this easy. Training is crucial but often underfunded.
- Fear of Letting Go: Professionals can fear "losing control" or worry if the person makes a "bad" choice (by whose definition?). Requires risk tolerance.
- Measuring Success is Trickier: How do you quantify "feeling more confident" or "having better relationships"? Traditional metrics often fail.
Putting Person Centered Approach into Action: Concrete Steps
Okay, theory is great. How do you *do* it practically? Here’s where the rubber meets the road.Essential Tools and Techniques
These aren't just forms; they're frameworks for conversation and discovery:- Active Listening (Truly): Not just waiting to speak. Hearing the words, the feelings, the unspoken needs. Paraphrasing to check understanding ("So, what matters most about that for you is...?").
- Good Conversations (Not Interrogations): Using open questions ("What does a good day look like for you?"), not just closed ones ("Do you need help bathing?"). Following the person's lead.
- Person Centered Planning Tools: Visual, flexible ways to capture a person's story, dreams, goals, and support needs. Examples:
- MAPS (Making Action Plans): Focuses on the person's history, dreams, nightmares, and building action plans.
- PATH (Planning Alternative Tomorrows with Hope): Visual backward planning from a compelling future vision.
- One-Page Profiles: A simple, constantly updated snapshot covering "What people like/admire about me," "What's important to me," "How best to support me."
Key Point: The tool itself is less important than the spirit in which it's used. A genuine person centered approach uses these as guides for conversation, not rigid templates to be filled out. Forced into a template? You've lost the plot.
The Person Centered Planning Meeting (Done Right)
This is often the cornerstone. But it can feel intimidating. Here’s how to make it work:- Who Decides Who Comes? The person does. Full stop. They invite who they want – family, friends, neighbour, pastor, whomever matters to *them*. Professionals are guests.
- Setting the Scene: Comfortable space. Maybe snacks the person likes. Relaxed atmosphere. No big boardroom table hierarchy.
- Who Leads? Ideally, a skilled facilitator the person trusts (could be an independent advocate if family/professional dynamics are tricky). The person is the star.
- Focus on Dreams & Strengths First: Start positive. "What are your hopes?" "What are you good at?" "What makes you happy?" Build from there.
- Action-Oriented: End with clear, concrete steps: Who is doing what? By when? How will we know it's working? Review date?
- Keep it Alive: This isn't a one-off document gathering dust. Review regularly. Is it still working? What needs changing?
Embedding it in Everyday Practice: Beyond the Meeting
This is the real challenge. How does the person centered approach seep into Tuesday morning at 10 am?| Area | Traditional Habit | Person Centered Shift |
|---|---|---|
| Morning Routine (Care Home) | Staff wake everyone according to the schedule for bathing/breakfast efficiency. | Residents choose their wake-up time. Flexible breakfast times. Bathing scheduled around preferences, not staff shifts. |
| Session Planning (Therapist) | Therapist follows a standard protocol based on diagnosis. | Therapist starts session: "What would be most useful for us to focus on today related to your goal of X?" Adjusts activities accordingly. |
| Support Worker Visit | Worker has a task list: clean kitchen, do laundry, prepare lunch. | Worker arrives: "Hi Sarah! What's feeling important for us to tackle together today from your plan?" Might skip laundry if Sarah wants help writing an email instead. |
| Goal Review (Case Manager) | Manager checks progress against pre-defined, standardized goals. | Manager asks: "How do you feel you're progressing towards the things *you* said mattered? What's working? What needs tweaking?" Goals themselves might change. |
Common Challenges (Yeah, You'll Hit These) & How to Navigate Them
Let’s be honest, doing this well is tough. Here’s what trips people up and how to get past it:Challenge 1: "We Don't Have Time for This!"
*The Pressure:* High caseloads. Short appointments. Demand for quick fixes. *The Person Centered Approach Solution:* It’s an investment. Frame it as saving time *later* by avoiding ineffective interventions. Start small. *Actionable Idea:* Dedicate just the *first 5 minutes* of an interaction purely to the person's agenda. "Before we dive into what I had planned, what's top of mind for *you* today related to X?" See what shifts.Challenge 2: "What if They Make a "Bad" Choice?"
*The Fear:* Person chooses something risky or unhealthy. Professional feels responsible. *The Person Centered Approach Solution:* Shift from control to informed risk management. Respect autonomy doesn't mean abandoning responsibility. *Actionable Idea:* Have a frank conversation. Explore the choice: "Help me understand why this feels like the best option for you?" Discuss potential consequences thoroughly. Document the discussion and the person's informed decision. Support them even if it's not your preferred choice, within safety/legal limits.Challenge 3: "But Our Systems/Software Aren't Set Up for This!"
*The Frustration:* Rigid electronic records demanding tick-boxes and standardized goals. *The Person Centered Approach Solution:* Be creatively subversive. Use free-text fields liberally. Attach scanned One-Page Profiles or meeting notes. Advocate for system changes. *Actionable Idea:* Record the standardized data the system *requires*. Then, add a clear section titled "Person's Own Goals & Priorities (Non-Negotiable)" directly underneath or attached.Challenge 4: "Staff Just Don't Get It / Resist Change"
*The Reality:* Old habits are ingrained. Staff may feel de-skilled or fearful. *The Person Centered Approach Solution:* Invest in *real* training, not just a lecture. Focus on values and practical skills. Coaching and mentoring are key. Celebrate small wins. *Actionable Idea:* Run workshops using real-life scenarios staff face. Role-play conversations. Get staff to experience being "planned for" in a traditional vs. person centered way. Powerful stuff.Measuring Success: Beyond the Tick Box
How do you know if your person centered approach is genuinely working? Traditional metrics often fall short. Consider these:- The Person's Own Feedback: Regularly ask: "How is this working for you?" "Do you feel listened to?" "Is this support helping you live the way you want?" Use simple surveys, conversations, or tools like "Goal Attainment Scaling" tailored to *their* goals.
- Quality of Life Indicators: Track things meaningful to the *person*, perhaps using a simple scale (1-10) on aspects *they* identified (e.g., "feeling connected," "having choice," "sense of purpose").
- Observing Interactions: Do staff speak *with* the person or *at* them? Is body language open and respectful? Is laughter or genuine conversation happening?
- Progress Towards Person-Defined Goals: Track milestones on *their* journey, however small or non-traditional ("Started attending chess club twice a month," "Cooked a meal for daughter for first time").
- Reduction in "Challenging Behaviors": Often, when needs are truly met respectfully, behaviors linked to frustration or lack of control decrease naturally.
Person Centered Approach: Your Burning Questions Answered (FAQ)
Let's tackle some common head-scratchers:Isn't a person centered approach just common sense / being nice?
Common sense? Maybe. Common practice? Sadly, no. Being nice is part of it, but it's deeper. It's a systematic shift in power dynamics, decision-making, and planning. It requires specific навыки and a conscious effort to resist ingrained system habits. Being nice is passive; a person centered approach is active and structural.
Can it work in large organizations or with strict regulations?
Absolutely, but it requires creativity and strong leadership commitment. Regulations set boundaries (like safety standards), but within those boundaries, there's almost always room for choice, flexibility, and tailoring. Focus on *how* things are done within the rules. Large orgs often start with pilot programs or specific teams to prove the model before scaling. It's harder, but possible and incredibly worthwhile.
What's the difference between person centered and patient centered?
Good spot! They overlap hugely, but "patient centered" often stays within the context of healthcare delivery and treating an illness. "Person centered approach" is broader. It emphasizes the individual *beyond* their diagnosis or label – their whole life, history, roles, relationships, and aspirations, whether they're interacting with healthcare, social services, education, or community support. It's about the person first, the service user second.
How do you handle disagreements within the person's support network?
Ah, the messy reality of families and teams! The golden rule: **The person's voice is paramount.** Facilitate open discussion focusing on what the *person* wants. Use a skilled, neutral facilitator if needed. Explore the roots of the disagreement. Sometimes it's fear or miscommunication. Document the person's clear wishes. While supporters' input is valuable, the ultimate decision rests with the competent individual. Conflict resolution skills are essential here.
Is it only for people with disabilities or health conditions?
Not at all! The core principles of respect, choice, control, and focusing on the individual's strengths and goals are universally applicable. Think customer service, HR practices, education, community planning, even family dynamics. Anywhere humans interact, a person centered approach fosters dignity and effectiveness. It’s good human practice.
How much does implementing a person centered approach cost?
There are costs: Training time, potential initial time investment, maybe new tools or software tweaks. BUT, significant savings often emerge: Reduced wasted resources on unwanted services, fewer crises stemming from unmet needs, lower staff turnover due to more meaningful work, and potentially better outcomes reducing long-term care needs. Think investment, not just cost. Start small to manage budgets.
Comment