Let's talk about Werner Herzog's Nosferatu the Vampyre 1979. Not many remakes capture the soul of the original while doing something entirely new, but this one? It's different. I remember renting the VHS back in the 90s – the box art alone gave me nightmares. Klaus Kinski's gaunt face staring out from that cover, those long fingernails. Didn't sleep properly for a week. But here's why you should watch it today.
This isn't your slick modern vampire flick. No sparkling teenagers here. Herzog's take on the Dracula story feels like wandering through a decaying European castle while a plague rat nibbles at your shoe. It's slow, deliberate, and utterly hypnotic. Why does this 45-year-old film still grip audiences? Let's peel back the coffin lid.
The Story Unraveled: What Actually Happens?
Jonathan Harker (Bruno Ganz), a German real estate agent, gets sent to Transylvania. His mission? Sell a creepy house in Wismar to Count Dracula (Klaus Kinski). From the moment he arrives, everything feels off. The locals won't help him, crossing themselves when he mentions the castle. That coach ride through the Carpathians? Pure dread captured on film.
What follows is a game of cat and mouse. Dracula buys the property, then travels by ship to Wismar – bringing plague rats with him. Meanwhile, Jonathan's wife Lucy (Isabelle Adjani) senses the danger through psychic dreams. Her warnings fall on deaf ears. The town descends into plague-induced chaos while Dracula stalks Lucy, seeing her as his tragic salvation.
The ending... wow. Without spoiling it, let's just say Herzog doesn't do Hollywood endings. It's bleak but weirdly poetic. That final sunrise shot still haunts me. Makes you wonder – is immortality really a gift?
Why This Vampire Film Still Bites
Most vampire movies focus on scares or romance. Nosferatu the Vampyre 1979 does neither. Instead, it creates an atmosphere of existential horror. Herzog treats Dracula not as a monster, but as a cursed immortal trapped by his own nature. Kinski plays him with this weary sadness – you almost pity him.
Three things make it timeless:
- Visual Poetry: Every frame looks like a Gothic painting. The mist-covered mountains, desolate beaches, plague-ravaged streets. Cinematographer Jörg Schmidt-Reitwein used natural light to create haunting shadows.
- Sound Design: That discordant score by Popol Vuh? All tribal drums and eerie flutes. Combined with the constant squeaking of rats... it gets under your skin.
- Slow-Burn Terror: Modern horror relies on jump scares. This builds dread through lingering shots of empty corridors and unnerving silences.
Cast Spotlight: Who Brought the Nightmares
| Actor | Role | Key Performance Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Klaus Kinski | Count Dracula | Used minimal makeup – his gaunt physique did the work. Movement inspired by spiders |
| Isabelle Adjani | Lucy Harker | Her wide-eyed terror became iconic. Played Lucy as intuitive and tragic |
| Bruno Ganz | Jonathan Harker | Masterfully portrayed descent into madness. Those hollow eyes... |
| Roland Topor | Renfield | Unhinged comic relief. Ate live bugs during filming (true story) |
Kinski was... difficult. Herzog nearly strangled him during filming. But that tension bleeds into the performance. You feel Dracula's ancient rage and exhaustion.
Production Nightmares: Behind the Scenes
Shooting was brutal. They filmed in Czechoslovakia during winter. Real rats were used – thousands of them. Animal handlers would release them from boxes daily. Crew members got sick from flea bites.
Key locations:
- Perlstein Castle, Czech Republic (Dracula's lair)
- Delft, Netherlands (stood in for plague-stricken Wismar)
- Schiedam, Netherlands (windmill scene)
- Tatra Mountains, Slovakia (Carpathian journey)
Funny thing – the Dutch town officials didn't know about the rat scenes. When they found out, Herzog had already shot the plague sequences. The backlash was fierce. Locals called it "the rat film" for years.
Side-by-Side: 1922 vs. 1979
How does Herzog's version compare to Murnau's silent classic? Both masterpieces, but different beasts.
| Aspect | Nosferatu (1922) | Nosferatu the Vampyre (1979) |
|---|---|---|
| Dracula's Look | Rat-like ears, clawed hands | Bald, elongated fingers, minimal makeup |
| Pacing | Faster, expressionist edits | Meditative long takes (avg. shot: 27 seconds) |
| Themes | Foreign invasion fear | Existential dread, disease as metaphor |
| Ending | Vampire destroyed by sunlight | Ambiguous sacrifice (won't spoil!) |
Herzog intentionally mirrored iconic shots – Dracula rising from his coffin, the shadow ascending stairs. But added his own flavor. That scene with the bats circling Dracula's head? Pure Herzog.
Where to Watch & Physical Media Guide
Streaming options change monthly, but here's the current landscape:
- Criterion Channel (HD with bonus features)
- Amazon Prime (rental only, $3.99)
- Shudder (frequently rotates in/out)
Physical collectors should hunt these down:
| Edition | Release Year | Special Features | Avg. Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shout Factory Blu-ray | 2019 | Herzog/Kinski commentary, deleted scenes | $25-$35 |
| BFI DVD (UK) | 2013 | Documentary: "The Nosferatu Archives" | $15-$20 (import) |
| German 4K Restoration | 2020 | 4K scan from original negative | $50+ (rare) |
Word to the wise: Avoid the public domain DVDs. They look awful. The color grading is crucial – those sickly greens and grays define the mood.
Cinematic Legacy: How It Changed Horror
Modern vampire tropes this film avoids:
- No sexy seduction
- No elaborate backstories
- No action sequences
Instead, it influenced:
- A24's atmospheric horror (The Witch, Hereditary)
- European art-horror like Let the Right One In
- Slow cinema movement
That plague metaphor? More relevant than ever post-COVID. Watching empty streets and panic-buying citizens hits differently now.
Common Viewer Questions Answered
Is Nosferatu the Vampyre 1979 scary?
Not in the Conjuring sense. It's unsettling. The horror comes from atmosphere and implication. That scene with hundreds of rats pouring through streets? Yeah, stick with me for weeks.
Why does Dracula look so different here?
Herzog wanted decay, not elegance. Kinski's Dracula isn't aristocratic – he's a diseased creature. The bald head came from Herzog seeing a sick bat. Those fingernails? Kinski's real nails grown for months.
Is the soundtrack available?
Popol Vuh's score got limited vinyl releases. Hard to find. Try eBay ($80+). Some tracks are on YouTube though – search "Nosferatu Phantom der Nacht soundtrack".
Are both language versions different?
Majorly. Herzog shot every scene twice – German and English. Performances vary. Kinski whispers more in German. Adjani seems colder in English. Purists debate which is "authentic."
What runtime should I watch?
Theatrical cut runs 107 minutes. Avoid the 96-minute US edit – they hacked out crucial atmosphere. German version is longest at 115 minutes but hardest to find.
Critical Reception: Then vs. Now
Initial reviews were mixed. Variety called it "tedious." Roger Ebert gave 3/4 stars but admitted it divided audiences. The slow pacing turned off 70s viewers expecting Exorcist-level shocks.
Modern reappraisal? Stellar. Here's why perceptions shifted:
- Recognized as Herzog's most visually rich film
- Kinski's performance now considered iconic
- Atmospheric horror became mainstream
Current ratings:
- Rotten Tomatoes: 94% (Critics), 85% (Audience)
- IMDb: 7.5/10 (45,000+ votes)
- Letterboxd: 4.1/5
Personal Viewing Tips
Don't watch this like a Marvel movie. Make it an event:
- Timing matters: Watch after midnight. Seriously. Daylight kills the vibe.
- Sound system required: Those rat squeaks and whispers need bass.
- Skip distractions: Put phones away. Every glance breaks the spell.
- Pair with: Dry red wine. Herzog drinks it constantly during commentary.
First-timers often ask: "Which version?" Go German if subtitles don't bother you. But English version works too – Adjani dubbed herself beautifully.
Fun fact: Herzog ate his own shoe during the film's promotion. Literally. Boiled for hours with garlic. He'd promised to do it if his friend finished a documentary. Cinema history is weird.
Why This Film Still Matters Today
Most horror remakes cash in on nostalgia. Nosferatu the Vampyre 1979 did the opposite. It took familiar material and made it painfully human. Dracula isn't a villain – he's a prisoner of his curse. Lucy's sacrifice isn't heroic – it's desperately sad.
Forty-five years later, it teaches us something about fear. Real terror isn't monsters under the bed. It's the plague outside your door. The lover who doesn't recognize you. The slow creep of inevitability. Few films capture that like this one does.
Still not convinced? Try this experiment. Watch any modern vampire show. Then watch Nosferatu the Vampyre 1979. See which one lingers when the screen goes dark.
Comment