You know, it's funny. One day I was staring at an ad for razors, and it hit me: How did this whole thing even start? When did women start shaving their armpits? It seems like such a normal part of life now, right? Grab a razor, some gel, job done. But it wasn't always like this. Seriously, think about it. Our great-great-grandmothers weren't stocking up on five-blade wonders. So what changed? That simple question sent me down a rabbit hole of old magazines, fashion history, and some frankly weird beauty trends. Turns out, the answer isn't as straightforward as you might think, and it involves marketing, fashion, war, and shifting ideas about what's 'clean'. Let's dig in.
The Bare Necessity? It Wasn't Always This Way
Hold onto your hats because this might shock you: for most of human history, women largely didn't shave their armpits. Nope. Not in ancient Egypt, Greece, or Rome. Not even in the Victorian era, when showing an ankle was scandalous! Body hair, including underarm hair, wasn't this massive issue it is today. Sometimes it was removed, sometimes it wasn't – it depended wildly on culture, class, and the time period.
Take Ancient Egypt. Those folks were big on hair removal, men and women alike. They used early razors made from sharpened stones or copper, and even sugary waxes kinda like what we use now. Smooth skin was linked to cleanliness and high status. But get this – it was often more about *all* body hair, not specifically targeting pits like we do today. Ancient Romans? Similar story for the elite. They used pumice stones, tweezers (ouch!), and even depilatory creams made from some pretty nasty stuff like resin and goat blood. Yeah, I'll stick with my aloe vera gel, thanks.
Jump forward to Europe in the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Things shifted. Visible body hair on women? Mostly fine. Paintings and writings from the time rarely make a fuss about it. Hair removal, when it happened, often focused on the face (foreheads!) or sometimes pubic hair for hygiene reasons, especially in bathhouses. Arm hair? Armpit hair? Not really on the radar as something offensive.
Even into the 19th century, as sleeveless dresses became fashionable for women, pictures and fashion plates rarely show perfectly bare underarms. It just wasn't a mainstream expectation. So when exactly did the tide turn? When did women start shaving their armpits as a widespread practice? That moment arrived surprisingly late.
The 20th Century Shift: Fashion, Marketing, and War
This is where things get interesting. The real push for smooth underarms in the Western world kicked off in the early 1900s, and it wasn't some organic trend. It was driven by some powerful forces.
Fashion Gets Sleeveless (and Demanding)
The big fashion revolution? Sleeveless dresses. Seriously. Before the 1910s, women's clothing was pretty covered up. Necklines were high, sleeves were long. Suddenly, designers like Paul Poiret started creating dresses with shorter sleeves or even sleeveless styles influenced by ancient Greece and a desire for more freedom of movement. Then flapper dresses of the 1920s took it further – shorter hemlines, dropped waists, and often sleeveless or with very thin straps. More skin was showing than ever before in modern Western fashion.
For the first time, female underarms were regularly visible in public. And guess what? Fashion magazines and advertisers saw an opportunity... or perhaps invented a problem to solve.
Marketing Steps In: Creating the "Problem"
This is the crucial bit. Companies realized they could sell way more razors if they convinced women they *needed* them. Before this, razors were marketed almost exclusively to men for facial shaving. How do you create a new market? You make body hair socially unacceptable. You link it to being unfeminine, dirty, or embarrassing.
Enter Harper's Bazaar, May 1915. A now-infamous ad featured a model in a sleeveless gown with her arms raised, showing perfectly smooth underarms. The headline screamed: "Summer Dress and Modern Dancing combine to make necessary the removal of objectionable hair." The ad pushed a depilatory cream called "X Bazin" (a cream, not a razor, interestingly). The key word? "Objectionable." They were planting the idea that this natural hair was suddenly offensive.
Razor companies like Gillette quickly jumped on board. By 1915, Gillette released the first razor marketed specifically to women in the US: the Milady Décolleté. The ads hammered home shame and social acceptability. They talked about "personal daintiness" and avoiding "embarrassment." The message was clear: smooth underarms weren't just fashionable; they were essential for being a proper, clean, attractive woman. It was brilliant (and kinda manipulative) marketing.
| Year | Key Event/Marketing Push | Impact on Shaving Norms |
|---|---|---|
| ~1910-1915 | Rise of sleeveless fashion (Poiret, early flapper influence) | Made underarms regularly visible, setting the stage. |
| 1915 | Harper's Bazaar Ad ("objectionable hair") & Gillette Milady Décolleté launch. | Major catalyst. Defined underarm hair as socially unacceptable and unfeminine. |
| 1917-1918 | US enters WWI; Gillette runs "Put Your Best Face Forward" campaign targeting wartime women workers. | Linked shaving to patriotism & modern efficiency. Increased razor sales. |
| Early 1920s | Flapper era fashion explodes; sleeveless dresses become iconic. | Bare underarms become standard for fashionable young women. Ads intensify focus on social acceptance. |
| Late 1920s - 1930s | Hemlines drop slightly, but sleeveless styles remain popular. Nylon shortages in WWII (1940s). | Shaving habit firmly established. Women shave legs more regularly due to nylon rationing making stockings scarce/luxurious. |
World War I (1914-1918) played a role too. With men away, women entered factories and workplaces in unprecedented numbers. Ads began linking a neat appearance (including shaving) to patriotism, efficiency, and modernity. Gillette's 1917 campaign "Put Your Best Face Forward" subtly pushed this idea. Shaving became part of the modern woman's routine.
By the roaring 1920s, the trend was solidifying. Flapper fashion defined the era, and bare underarms were part of that liberated (though heavily marketed) look. Magazines featured ads constantly reminding women that body hair was unattractive. The expectation that women should shave their armpits became widespread in the US and, soon after, much of the Western world. So, pinpointing **when did women start shaving their underarms** as a common practice? The answer is firmly rooted in the decade between 1915 and the mid-1920s.
Personal Angle: My own grandma, born in the 1920s, always talked about how her mother thought shaving was a ridiculous fad when she first started as a teenager. "Why on earth would you bother with *that*?" she'd say. But the pressure from friends and ads won out. By the time my mom was a teen in the 50s, it was just something you *did*, no question. That generational shift happened incredibly fast.
Beyond the 20s: How Shaving Became Embedded
Once the norm took hold in the 20s, it stuck. But why?
- Razor Evolution: Technology made it easier and safer. Before the Milady Décolleté, women sometimes used the same heavy, dangerous straight razors as men, or harsh chemical depilatories. Dedicated women's razors became lighter, safer (safety guards!), and eventually disposable. Shaving cream formulated for more sensitive skin appeared.
- Nylon Shortages (WWII): This had a huge knock-on effect. During WWII, nylon was rationed for parachutes and other war materials. Stockings vanished. What did women do? Many shaved their legs and applied "liquid stockings" (leg makeup) or drew lines up the back with eyeliner to mimic stocking seams. This massively normalized leg shaving as well.
- Post-War Boom & Idealized Femininity: The 1950s reinforced the image of the perfectly groomed, ultra-feminine woman. Ads for razors, creams, and deodorants (more on that in a sec) relentlessly pushed smoothness as part of that ideal.
- Link to Deodorants: This is key. The rise of effective anti-perspirants and deodorants happened around the same time. Early deodorant ads explicitly linked underarm hair to odor and "offensiveness." Shaving was heavily promoted to maximize deodorant effectiveness and "freshness." The two products became intertwined in the quest for "acceptable" underarms. Many still believe shaving is inherently more hygienic because of this decades-long marketing link, though medically, hair removal itself doesn't necessarily improve hygiene.
Different Timelines Around the World
While the US led the charge fueled by aggressive marketing, the trend spread globally at different speeds, heavily influenced by Western media and fashion.
- UK & Western Europe: Adoption followed the US fairly closely, lagging perhaps by a few years. Fashion trends and magazines crossed the Atlantic. By the 1930s, it was becoming common among urban, fashionable women.
- Other Regions: Adoption varied significantly. In many parts of Asia, Latin America, and elsewhere, widespread female underarm shaving became common much later, often post-WWII or even later, heavily tied to the increasing global influence of American/Western beauty standards through film, TV, and advertising.
So, while 1915 is the landmark year for the US push, the answer to **when did females begin shaving their armpits** globally has a much broader timeline.
Why Do We Still Do It? Debates and Alternatives
Fast forward to today. Shaving is still the dominant method, but it's not without its critics, alternatives, and changing attitudes.
**Why the Hold?** Honestly? Habit and intense societal pressure. It's deeply ingrained as the "default" for women in many cultures. The beauty industry spends billions reinforcing this norm. Walk down any drugstore aisle – the sheer wall of pink razors, creams, waxes, and sprays is overwhelming. It sends a constant message about what's expected.
**The Feminist Pushback:** It started bubbling in the 1960s and 70s alongside broader feminist movements. Activists questioned why women were spending time, money, and enduring discomfort to remove natural body hair. Remember those iconic photos of women proudly displaying body hair? It was a political statement rejecting imposed beauty standards. This conversation has never gone away and has gained significant traction again recently, especially online.
**The Body Positivity Movement:** This broader movement has embraced body hair acceptance as part of loving your body as it is. Social media platforms showcase women with unshaven pits, legs, and more, challenging the norm and promoting choice. Hashtags like #Januhairy or #ArmpitHair trends pop up. It's becoming more visible, though still niche compared to the mainstream.
**Practical Annoyances:** Let's be real, shaving sucks for a lot of people. Common complaints include:
- Razor Burn & Bumps: Those angry red bumps? Ingrown hairs? Ouch. Super common, especially with coarse hair or sensitive skin.
- It's Time-Consuming: It adds minutes (or more) to your routine, multiple times a week. It feels like a chore.
- Cost: Razors, blades, creams, gels – it all adds up over a lifetime. Seriously, tally it sometime!
- Skin Irritation: For many, it's just plain irritating, leading to dryness, itching, or rashes.
Popular Alternatives to the Razor
If you want hair removal but hate shaving, there are options. Each has pros and cons:
| Method | How It Works | Pros | Cons | Cost Range | Pain Level (Generally) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waxing (Soft/Hard) | Warm wax applied, cloth strip pressed on, ripped off against hair growth. | Results last 3-6 weeks; Hair grows back finer over time. | Painful; Can cause bumps/ingrowns; Needs regrowth for next session; Messy; Risk of burns. | $$ ($15-$50+ per session) | High (especially first time) |
| Sugaring | Similar to waxing, uses a paste of sugar, lemon, water. | Less painful than wax for some; Natural ingredients; Less sticky; Can grab shorter hairs. | Still painful; Technique-sensitive; Can cause bumps/ingrowns; Needs regrowth. | $$ ($20-$60+ per session) | Medium-High |
| Depilatory Creams ("Nair" etc.) | Chemical cream dissolves hair at skin surface. | Fast (5-10 mins); Painless; Inexpensive; Easy at home. | Results only last a few days (like shaving); Strong chemical smell; Can cause severe burns/rashes (patch test!); Messy. | $ ($5-$15 per bottle) | None (unless reaction) |
| Epilators | Mechanical device with tweezers that pluck hairs as rolled over skin. | Results last 3-6 weeks; Can use on shorter hair than waxing; Home device (one-time cost). | Very painful (like many tweezers at once); Noisey; Can cause bumps/ingrowns; Takes time. | $$ ($30-$100+ for device) | Very High |
| Laser Hair Removal | Laser targets pigment in hair follicle, damaging it to reduce growth. | Significant long-term hair reduction/permanent for some; Smooth results. | Very expensive; Needs multiple sessions (6-8+); Works best on dark hair/light skin; Mild pain (snapping rubber band); Requires strict sun avoidance. | $$$$ ($150-$500+ per session) | Low-Medium |
| Electrolysis | Ultra-fine needle inserted into follicle delivers electric current to destroy it. | Only FDA-approved method for "permanent" removal; Works on all hair/skin colors. | Extremely expensive per session; Very time-consuming (hairs treated one by one); Requires many sessions; Can be painful; Risk of scarring if done poorly. | $$$$ (Cost per hour $50-$150+, total cost thousands) | Medium-High |
| Trimming | Using small scissors or an electric trimmer to cut hair very short. | Quick; Easy; Cheap; Painless; Reduces bulk/visibility without complete removal; Minimal skin irritation. | Not smooth; Hair visible/stubbly feel; Needs frequent touch-ups. | $ ($0 - $30 for trimmer) | None |
| Doing Nothing / Growing It Out | Just letting hair grow naturally. | Free; Painless; Zero effort; No skin irritation. | Societal judgment/stares/comments can occur; Texture/feel personal preference. | $0 | None |
The bottom line? There's no perfect method. It depends entirely on your budget, pain tolerance, desired results, and skin sensitivity. The most important thing is realizing you have choices. You absolutely don't *have* to shave just because an ad from 1915 told women they should.
Answering Your Burning Questions (FAQ)
Okay, let's tackle some of the specific things people are asking when they wonder **when did women start shaving their armpits**.
Q: Was there a specific year when women started shaving their armpits?
Not one single year, but 1915 is the critical turning point in the US. That's when Harper's Bazaar ran that notorious ad declaring underarm hair "objectionable" and Gillette launched the first razor marketed directly to women. This kicked off the massive push to make it the norm.
Q: Did *any* women shave their armpits before the 1900s?
Yes, absolutely, but it wasn't common or expected in Western cultures. Examples include:
- Ancient Egypt & Rome: Elite women and men often removed body hair for cleanliness or status reasons, including underarms, using early razors, tweezers, or creams.
- Specific Cultures: Practices varied globally. Some cultures practiced hair removal for ritual or aesthetic reasons long before Western influence.
- Individuals: There were always individuals who chose to remove hair for personal preference, perhaps inspired by other cultures or driven by personal ideas of neatness. But it wasn't a widespread societal expectation.
Q: Why did armpit shaving become popular but not, say, arm hair?
Great question! It largely boils down to visibility. Sleeveless fashion exposed underarms. Arms, however, were generally covered less completely (shorter sleeves) or the hair was finer/less noticeable. Marketing focused intensely on the newly exposed zone deemed "objectionable." There wasn't the same concentrated effort to make light arm hair taboo. Plus, underarms got linked to sweat and odor fears via deodorant marketing, amplifying the "need" to remove hair there specifically.
Q: Is shaving your armpits actually more hygienic?
This is a biggie. The short answer? Not necessarily. Marketing heavily pushed this idea to sell deodorant and razors.
- Hair vs. Bacteria: Sweat itself is mostly odorless. Odor comes from bacteria breaking down sweat. Hair *can* trap sweat and potentially give bacteria more surface area to work on, potentially increasing odor if you don't wash regularly.
- Shaving's Role: Shaving *can* make it easier to wash the skin surface thoroughly and might make antiperspirant/deodorant application slightly more direct. However, shaving can also cause micro-cuts and irritation, potentially increasing infection risk if hygiene is poor.
- The Verdict: Good hygiene (regular washing with soap and water) is far more important for controlling odor than whether you have hair or not. Removing hair might offer a slight edge in reducing odor *retention* for some, but it's not inherently "more hygienic." Clean skin, shaved or not, is hygienic. The link was primarily a marketing invention.
Q: When did women start shaving their LEGS regularly?
Leg shaving followed the armpit trend, lagging slightly. The sleeveless dress exposed pits first. Hemlines rose in the 1920s, but sheer stockings covered legs. The massive shift came during World War II (early 1940s). Nylon was rationed for the war effort, making stockings scarce and expensive. Women began shaving their legs and using leg makeup or drawing "seams" to mimic stockings. This normalized leg shaving on a huge scale, and the habit stuck after the war.
Q: Are more women stopping shaving their armpits now?
Yes, definitely, though it's still a minority movement. The body positivity movement and feminist critiques of beauty standards have empowered more women to question the norm. Social media visibility (#BodyHairPositivity) helps normalize it. Celebrities like Jemima Kirke, Mo'Nique, or Madonna (occasionally!) have showcased unshaven pits. It's becoming a more visible choice, representing a rejection of imposed norms and embracing natural bodies. However, the vast majority of women in Western societies still shave regularly due to deeply ingrained social pressure. The trend *is* shifting, but slowly.
Wrapping It Up: More Than Just a Date
So, trying to find a single answer to **when did women begin shaving their armpits**? It's messy. While ancient examples exist, the watershed moment that created the *widespread expectation* we know today happened shockingly recently – between 1915 and the mid-1920s in the US, propelled by sleeveless fashion and, most crucially, aggressive marketing that invented a "problem" (natural hair) to sell a solution (razors and creams). World events like WWI and WWII solidified the habit. Deodorant advertising cemented the link to "hygiene," even if that link is debatable.
Understanding this history is powerful. It shows us that the pressure to have smooth underarms isn't some timeless biological imperative. It's a relatively recent social construct, driven largely by commerce. Knowing this gives us perspective. It lets us step back and ask: "Do *I* want to do this, or am I doing it because a 100-year-old ad campaign told my great-grandma she should?"
The beauty landscape *is* changing. More women are pushing back, embracing their body hair as a statement against unrealistic expectations or simply as a personal choice. Alternatives to daily shaving abound. The key takeaway? The decision of what to do (or not do) with your own body hair belongs entirely to you. Do it because *you* prefer it, not because some marketer from a century ago decided it was "objectionable." That’s the real freedom.
Comment